Search This Blog

Showing posts with label jesus loves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jesus loves. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Adoption Realities

If you’ve read my blogging for any length of time, you’re probably aware that I’m a proponent of adoption. Parenting and loving children whom you did not give birth to is not a new concept. It’s been around for centuries. But in modern times, some truths have emerged that aren’t so pretty. I can see these truths. There’s evidence of these truths that would back up my observations. And yet, I’ve never seen anyone write about them or address. Not even Oprah seems to have picked up on these ugly truths about modern adoption.

So what’s the deal? What controversies am I about to ignite today? Bear with me here. I think I have some points worth making. Let’s examine what I can observe.


The first thing I notice is that despite all of our progressive, civilized thinking, there are more children in the world today without parents than there’ve ever been. Estimates by international charities and governments put the number of orphans, for example, as somewhere north of 30 million. Imagine, more than 30 million children are growing up without parents. It’s a staggering number. Sadly, it’s a growing number too. The world’s population of orphans may be one of the fastest growing segments of mankind.


The second thing I notice is that more people are spending more money, waiting longer and working harder than ever before to become adoptive parents. It sort of doesn’t make sense. You’d think the theory y of supply-and-demand would kick in here … and that the proliferation of orphans would drive down the cost of adopting them. But that would assume the adoptive parents are genuinely interested in the orphans and have their best interests at heart. They often times don’t.


A lot of the money spent on adoption today is spent because the adoptive parents are selfish. The adoption is all about them --- and not about the child they’ll get. Few people who spend money adopting a child are driven because the Lord moved in their hearts toward the child. Instead, they see themselves as parents, and decide (for a variety of reasons) to fulfill that identity with adoption. Now that I’ve decided to become a parent, it’s just a matter of deciding which child to adopt, from where, how much it’ll cost and how long it’ll take.


This is not unlike the woman in the news recently, who decided she would marry on a certain date next year. She’s gone about planning the wedding, purchasing all she’ll need and engaging everyone she wants to make it her special day. Her final objective now is to find the husband who will meet her requirements in her decision to become a wife. It sounds crazy doesn’t it? It’s been in the news and people are talking about it because it’s unconventional, a bit outrageous, and more than a little self-centered and piggish of this bride-to-be. It also shares several things in common with many of the people who decide to become adoptive parents.

I talked with someone recently who told me, “If I’m not married by the time I’m 35, then I plan to just adopt a kid.” In a similar conversation a few months ago, someone was trying to conceive a child – to no avail. When I suggested adoption, they responded, “Oh, we may consider that. But we’d want to try and have our own child first. If we can’t do that then we’ll adopt.” In yet another conversation about a year ago, I was talking to someone who has adopted internationally several times, and they were explaining how expensive it has been. When I questioned the need for such expense, the woman answered, “Oh it’s been expensive, but it has totally been worth it because we’ve been able to select just the right children to build the family we wanted.”


These are not moronic people. They’re not evil people either. But they consider such statements to be totally plausible. And yet they fail to see the giant label of selfishness that’s stamped all over these perspectives. Their adoptions of orphans are all about them. The actual child is inconsequential to their overall strategy. Just like the ambitious bride who plans her marriage and then shops for prospective husbands – these people plan their parenthood and then shop for prospective children. I imagine some of these adoption agencies feel a bit like order takers sometimes. “Tell me what kind of child you want, how much you’re willing to pay – and I’ll see what I can find that meets your requirements.”


I know, you’re going to tell me that my perspective is overly cynical and mean-spirited. But you won’t be able to convince me that I’m wrong. These adoption efforts have selfishness stamped all over them. Call me a cynic, but I believe adoption should be about the child. “Are there any unwanted, unloved children out there? Let me be the one to stand in the gap and love on them. Come here my little one. I will love you. I will lead you. I will nurture you.” Such a driving force would not likely find an abundant supply of perfect Caucasian infants (which is what most adoptive parents are seeking these days).


The third thing I notice is that most people are ignorant about the plight of children today. They don’t know, for example that there are more than 30 million orphans – most of whom will never be adopted by anybody. They don’t know that in the U.S. there are thousands upon thousands of children in foster care mostly because they had inappropriate parents. They’re available for adoption. Most states even offer financial assistance to the adoptive parents. But they are often of mixed race, physically and/or mentally handicapped, in sibling groups, have health issues and probably are emotionally ill. And no one will take them, love them, lead them, nurture them and raise them. They will be “wards of the state” until they reach chronological age of adulthood – at which point they will be sent out into society to fend for themselves. States don’t care for parentless adults. They don’t send them to college. They don’t help them find their first job. How many people know that? Do you suppose if they did they would continue to spend tens of thousands of dollars seeking perfect white infants from abroad?


The fourth thing that I know about adoption is that it can be incredibly challenging. Even perfect white infants from Russia or China (or whatever country is in favor at the moment) will come with emotional baggage. They didn’t get nurtured at their mother’s breast. They didn’t have that skin-on-skin contact that is so vital in infancy to a child’s ability to bond and trust and relate. So adoptive parents should expect to spend thousands on therapy, special schooling and maybe even family counseling. Raising adopted children has its challenges. And some of them can be severe. It’s not for the faint of heart.


Several years ago there was a riveting movie called, Mommie Dearest. It was the story of Hollywood actress Joan Crawford and her mothering of her four adopted children. As the story goes, Joan wanted to be a mother, so she went and got the children she needed to meet that requirement. Unfortunately, her children were dynamic. They were complex. They had feelings, and demands. They could be rebellious. They could be inconvenient. They required sacrifices. And as the story played out, we saw that several of these things had apparently not been in Joan’s plans for motherhood. I suspect they’re not in the plans that lots of people have for parenthood.


So what’s the point? Why am I blogging today about this? Well, believe it or not, I’m not trying to bash adoptive parents. Any child that gets adopted and becomes loved and cared for is a good thing – regardless of the motive behind the adoption. But frankly, I don’t think we’re going to get anywhere with these millions of orphans unless our motives change.


Could we have a noble belief – such as the notion that we could eliminate orphans? We hold fast to the ideal that we can, for example, eradicate poverty. Could we hold a similar ideal for the plight of unloved, unwanted, and uncared for children in the world?


The situation won’t improve until the hearts of capable adults are broken for these children. It is my prayer that at least 30 million hearts would be broken for today’s parentless children. They’re in foster care. They’re in orphanages. They’re on the streets, fending for themselves. They’re trapped in sexual slavery (literally thousands of them). Many of them have been abused physically, sexually or emotionally. Most of them have suffered extreme neglect. They want for basic needs like nutrition, health care and education.

Can our self-centered hearts turn from the ideal of using the orphans to fill the orders that our idyllic lives require? Can our hearts be broken for these children? Will we step out in faith and in sacrifice on their behalf? That is my prayer. It is my great hope.

So tell me, do you have room in your heart for any more of God’s children today? How many empty beds are in your home right now? Can you honestly look at 30 million children whom nobody wants and nobody loves --- and tell me that God “hasn’t called you” to do anything about that?

Friday, May 07, 2010

Church Marketing

I've blogged before about church marketing, church growth and other topics popular with the modern American Christian church. Recently I had the fortune of talking with some pastors about the growth of their own church. Somewhat like a consulting engagement (for which I wasn't actually paid), we were examining the ways of their churches.

Most pastors of churches want their churches to grow. It consumes a lot of their thinking. "How can I attract more people to my church? How can I then keep them in my church?" These are the same kinds of questions that retailers, restaurants and other types of businesses ask. Essentially they're trying to figure out how to gather followers and to keep themselves then relevant to those followers. And so it is with churches.

Most churches today use web sites for marketing purposes, and some use web sites to communicate with their congregations. A very few churches use web sites to "do business" with their members and the community. (That would be, for example, like having people sign up for things on the web site, or even purchase books and materials, ask for prayer, become a church member, schedule a baptism, etc.)

When a business or commercial organization develops a web site, it tends to have some fundamental criteria in mind:

1. Attract new customers.
2. Communicate with existing customers.
3. Market goods and services to the community.
4. Facilitate transactions with customers.
5. Become "sticky" (i.e., relevant) to customers.

Quite frankly, I think that churches would do well to consider similar criteria. Too many of them just put some basic information out on the web. Their web sites end up being tantamount to a billboard on the information super highway. And if we're honest, billboards tend to accomplish only brand awareness, at best. Further more, the more billboards there are on a highway, the less that any of them can actually accomplish. Churches in particular are challenged on the web as much as they are anywhere else.

So the discussion we were having recently started with the web site, moved to church marketing and finally landed on one pivotal question. "What would make our church most attractive to new people?" We examined many possibilities, but the conclusion was that the most attractive thing would be for our church to actually care about people.

I know, most churches think that's their core competency. They love everybody, and love is behind everything they do. Are the people in the community buying it though? Statistically, they're not. About 4,000 churches in America go out of business every single year. Simply put, the modern American Christian church has never been less relevant to its target audience than it is right now. And the trend is moving in the wrong direction.

How can this be? Aren't churches spending more money than ever on church marketing? Don't they have organized church growth campaigns? Aren't the videos on YouTube.com clever and entertaining? Don't they have amazing bands and exciting children's ministries? Yes of course they do. Unfortunately, the modern culture isn't convinced that this is love.

The cappuccino bar, the totally hip youth center, the children's ministry that someone knocks themselves out for every week ... they're all well and good. The engaging band, the state-of-the-art audio/visual support, the pastoral blogs and Tweets, the pod casts, bookstores, libraries and even church cafeterias are all wonderful amenities. But they don't seem to appeal to the "love languages" of anyone the church is trying to reach. Does anyone know why?

There is a very comical video on YouTube (that was actually filmed at my church). It's a parody of how Starbucks (coffee shops) might look if they marketed themselves like churches do. (You can check it out at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7_dZTrjw9I.) While entertaining and engaging, it seems not to identify what is right. It just pokes fun of what is wrong. As it turns out, there are lots of videos on YouTube that do this - poke fun of what's wrong with churches today.

We give people cards and encourage them to invite their friends. We have free gifts for newcomers. Some churches even have special VIP parking for visitors. We do our darnedest to look good for customers. But consider if you went into the local big box store - and couldn't find what you wanted - and couldn't get anyone to help you - and felt awkward like you were in a foreign land. Would you want to return there to shop again?

Why do people go to church? If they're honest, at the core of their being, they want to be loved by God. There's something in them that yearns for the love of God and they go to church hoping to find it.

So if I were to start a church marketing consultancy, I think I would start by teaching the people who are already in my client churches how to love others. It seems to be a lost art in these modern times! And yet, I am now firmly convinced it is the golden secret in church marketing.