Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Oldest Christian Bible Digitized

The surviving pages of the world's oldest Christian Bible have been reunited — digitally. The early work known as the Codex Sinaiticus has been housed in four separate locations across the world for more than 150 years.

But starting Monday, it became available for perusal on the Web at so scholars and other readers can get a closer look at what the British Library calls a "unique treasure."

"(The book) offers a window into the development of early Christianity and firsthand evidence of how the text of the Bible was transmitted from generation to generation," said Scot McKendrick, head of Western manuscripts at the British Library.

As it survives today, Codex Sinaiticus comprises just over 400 large leaves of prepared animal skin, each of which measures 15 inches by 13.5 inches (380 millimeters by 345 millimeters). It is the oldest book that contains a complete New Testament and is only missing parts of the Old Testament and the Apocrypha.

The 4th-century book, written in Greek, has been digitally reunited in a project involving groups from Britain, Germany, Russia and Egypt, which each possessed parts of the 1,600-year-old manuscript.

They worked together to publish new research into the history of the Codex and transcribed 650,000 words over a four-year period.

Codex Sinaiticus, which loosely translated means "the book from Sinai," was discovered at the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Mount Sinai by German Bible scholar Constantine Tischendorf in the mid-19th century. Much of it eventually wound up in Russia — just how exactly the British Library won't say, citing lingering sensitivity over the circumstances surrounding its removal from the monastery.

The British Library bought 347 pages from Soviet authorities in 1933. Forty-three pages are at the University Library in Leipzig, Germany, and six fragments are at the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg. And in 1975, monks stumbled on 12 more pages and 40 fragments stashed in a hidden room at the monastery at Mount Sinai.

Juan Garces, the Codex Sinaiticus project manager, said the only other Bible that rivals Codex Sinaiticus in age is the Codex Vaticanus, which was written around the same time but lacks parts of the New Testament.

On the Codex parchment leaves is written around half of the Old Testament and Apocrypha, the whole of the New Testament and two early Christian texts not found in modern Bibles. Most of the first part of the Bible manuscript — containing most of the so-called historical books, from Genesis to 1 Chronicles — is missing and presumed to be lost.

Garces said Codex Sinaiticus was handwritten by four scribes. Experts had previously believed there were only three, but researchers at the British Library looked at the script with high quality digital imaging that revealed the hand of a fourth penman.

The digitized manuscript includes more than 800 pages and fragments, including the pages discovered in 1975 — published for the first time.

On the Net:


  1. Anonymous7:02 AM

    How wonderful that finally there is concrete evidence that the Bible has been changed, modernised, mis-interpreted and has certainly been found to have mis-directed its followers for centuries. The Bible clearly is not the word of God but is the work of man. Though it does hold narratives that have helped guide society through the decades, it clearly should not be taken literally and is intended for interpretation. So the next time you hear a Christian shouting at the Jews, denying homosexuality or barking against abortion, remember that they are the fools who follow the words of ancient man, not the blessed who follow the Lord for we are all Gods children regardless. I hope that this news ripples through the heart of all organised religion and shakes the people to think on their own merits and use their own intelligence, rather then the out dated intelligence of their ancestors from centuries ago! Peace be with us.

  2. Anonymous10:37 PM

    You are so deluded. Your conclusion that this is "evidence" is so misguided. I shall pray for your ignorance. Sadly this blogger allows moronic ranting and raving like yours.

  3. Anonymous10:41 PM

    I agree. Your ranting and raving are senseless given the context of this blog. If you so believe what you say, why are you wasting your time reading a Christian blogger who takes a firm stand on who Christ is and what the Bible is? Me thinks you doth protest too much!